251
(so far as I see ) that his salary sword
be increased. This seems to me the second
wistance in W? [to quote for Herbert) " for Ball approaches the question with "a lief sense of what is due to himself"
W Huber
Wh
R:82
11/10/71
The ordinance magh sanctioned. It is
unpretted incuend the purisdiction of the Summary Cant, had the milled in consideratern
that thone causes, which
No Balli application for ineccese of salary and praction whether much
Mimpia
4^1
desirable.
wideed
A
I
Even under the circumstances
The
pretion of uncreen of Salay might have ren treated separaty As at present advised I shared think the Salary of £1500 ample for the
who work which even under the Extended Minance do Ball would han had to perform. But an increase of 2500 efferers preposterous.
I obred be diespond to inform the far. that di K is of pinion that the jurisdiction other Cant shared to increased in the memor preposs Ither clauses which won omitted net of this Obriance. Less. the pertion of any increon & Salary to be disford (depacctly. That befor deciding that question, shaved to Bull still fun an vieren, Dr. K blooded durin tot frommished with a full account of the work
other oneinand done in the sount under the present system - the number of days the [mut "sits of the Final deng which it is occupied each day.
The
of W. Ball know he has begin
state this he m
thes
may forris' account of the time occupied in
abate his demand, is if
I quite apre
ki creand
"JTH.
124/10
that the pirisdiction should be a the questions of salary kept altopther
distinct. But in
convegning
that instruction
می
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.